About Octagem
A scientifically-grounded standard for carbon credit quality,
derived from carbon's own geometry
Our Mission
Octagem Institute exists to correct a fundamental flaw in carbon markets: treating avoidance and removal as equivalent.
For 30 years, the $28 billion voluntary carbon market has operated without a rigorous quality standard. Projects that prevent new emissions (avoidance) trade at similar prices to those that extract existing CO₂ (removal), despite fundamentally different atmospheric impacts.
This is like a bank accepting "I didn't take out a new loan" as a mortgage payment. The carbon accounting ledger remains unbalanced, atmospheric CO₂ continues to accumulate, and buyers lack the tools to distinguish high-integrity credits from paper offsets.
The Octagem Framework Solution
Scientifically Derived
The framework isn't arbitrary—it's discovered from first principles. Three binary questions (2³ = 8) create complete credit type classification. Carbon's octet rule (8 electrons for stability) provides chemical confirmation. The octagem visualization enables instant assessment.
We didn't design this system. We discovered it.
Visually Clear
The octagem shape makes quality instantly visible. Large symmetric octagems = comprehensive excellence. Collapsed sides = critical failures. The shape doesn't lie, and carbon market participants can finally see what they're buying.
Like Energy Star for appliances, FDA Nutrition Labels for food, or S&P Credit Ratings for bonds—not a competing product, but the common industry language everyone uses to communicate quality.
Core Principles
1. Removal ≠ Avoidance
Credits must be classified by their atmospheric impact. Removing existing CO₂ is fundamentally different from preventing new emissions. The Octagem Framework makes this distinction visible through Point 1 (Methodology) scoring.
2. Net Efficiency Matters
A carbon credit that requires 0.6 tons of CO₂ to produce (fossil-powered DAC) delivers only 0.4 tons of net benefit. Point 8 (Net Efficiency) prevents catastrophic scaling failures where markets pay for gross removal while ignoring carbon costs.
3. Social Justice is Essential
Point 6 (Social Impact) carries 1.5x weight and anchors the octagem at 180°. Community-led projects with equitable benefit sharing score higher. This prevents green colonialism and ensures carbon markets serve people, not just profit.
4. Comprehensive Quality
Excellence in one dimension doesn't compensate for failure in another. The octagem rewards balanced quality. A project with perfect methodology but zero social impact creates a deformed shape—visually signaling incomplete integrity.
Why Now?
Carbon markets are at an inflection point. Regulatory frameworks (EU Taxonomy, SEC disclosure, ICVCM standards) are demanding rigor. Corporate buyers are rejecting low-quality offsets. Yet the market lacks a universal quality language.
The Octagem Framework arrives as this need becomes critical. It provides:
- Regulatory alignment - Maps directly to ICVCM, EU, and US standards
- Visual clarity - The octagem makes quality instantly assessable
- Market differentiation - AAA projects can justify premium pricing
- Scientific credibility - Derived from carbon's own geometry, not marketing
Carbon seeks eight electrons for stability.
Carbon credits should seek eight points for integrity.
Get Involved
Octagem is open-source and designed for universal adoption
For Buyers
Use Octagem to audit your portfolio, identify weak credits, and build a high-integrity strategy
For Developers
Score your projects, identify enhancement opportunities, and market your octagem premium
For Researchers
Contribute to methodology refinement, case study development, and framework evolution